When we decided to analyze our data from the Learning Success Dyslexia Screener we found some very shocking results. Over 60% of those filling out the screener were searching for help for a girl. Most accepted studies have come to the conclusion that there are far more boys having difficulty with reading than girls. Somewhere in the area of two to three times as many. So when we realized more parents were screening girls that put up a red flag and we investigated deeper. What we found was shocking.
Studies Disagree On The Prevalence Of Dyslexia In Girls
A 1990 Study purported "no significant differences in the prevalence of reading disabilities in research-identified boys compared with research-identified girls". The claim was that referral bias in schools accounted for a much larger number of boys to be identified as reading disabled but there was no real difference in prevalence across genders
But a later study in 2004 refuted this early 1990 study. The 2004 study looked at four earlier studies. These 4 studies were comprised of Representative groups from various countries. The study looked at the bottom 15% of readers in these groups and found that the majority were boys. The statistics showed that boys we're two to three times more likely to have a specific reading disability. The Study Conclusion: "Reading disabilities are clearly more frequent in boys than in girls."
This subject has been contentious to say the least. The 1990 study got a great deal of press so created many advocates. Yet opposing studies seemed to have more credibility. They had much larger sample sizes and had more duplication. So these studies generally have won out in the debate and it has been generally accepted that far more boys suffer from a reading disability.
So When We Saw That More Girls Were Being Screened That Fact Really Stood Out
What we found was that over 60% of those searching for and taking the screener were filling it out for a girl. These people had searched for terms such as "Dyslexia Test", landed on our website, and completed the screener. So presumably the majority of searches for "dyslexia Test" are people looking for help for a girl.
(All info was anonymized before preparing this report)
This, to us, didn't mean the debate had been won. The number of searches does not necessarily quantitive proof. But it did force us to stand up and take notice. And when we dug in deep to the data that's when we found the more interesting, and alarming data.
What is more important here is:
The ages of the boys the screener was being filled out for was Much Younger than the ages of the girls!!!
The boys in question were at very young ages. Ages at which intervention is much simpler. Ages where self-esteem has not yet been deeply damaged. The majority were between seven and nine. But for girls, this was much different. The girls were being identified much later. Most in their teens or later. The bulk being between fourteen and sixteen.
Here's a chart of the data we discovered:
Notice at ages 6-10 the percentages of boys being screened is considerably higher. At age 8 nearly double the girls. However, somewhere between age 13 and fourteen, it has flipped. At these ages, the number of girls being screened is nearly double the boys. The above chart shows percentages as a percentage of given gender. In other words, girls as a percentage of girls screened and boys as a percentage of boys screened.
The same data is shown in the chart below but each is shown as a percentage of the total
Expressed this way we can clearly see the number of screenings for girls nearly triples those for boys at ages fourteen through sixteen and over double for adults (The screener was designed for children but still gets completed by many adults and is still valid)
Or looking at the percentages below and above age 13 we get this graph.
Here we can see that of all of the screeners taken for girls only 37% of those were taken below age 13. Whereas for boys 56% of respondents were below age 13.
A reading disability does not just pop up at age fourteen or fifteen unless there is some sort of brain injury or dementia causing illness. Signs will start early on as a child is learning to read. This is evidenced by the ages where the bulk of the boys were screened. So something else must be going on. Why are the searches for girls not happening predominantly until teens or later? Are girls just not getting the interventions they need and therefor falling far behind their potential?
Hiding the Problem
Likely what is happening is that girls are generally higher on the agreeableness scale. Simply being more pleasant than boys may make the difficulty more hidden. Whereas boys are more likely to act out in some way the girls may conceal the problem. Especially since they are likely self-assessing as lacking in intelligence. It's possible that many girls just assume they are not intelligent and then do everything they can do to hide their perceived lack of intelligence. And since they are generally more emotionally intelligent they are more capable of doing so.
Some of these quotes by famous (and highly intelligent) dyslexic women tell a tale.
“I thought I wasn’t smart. I just couldn’t retain anything”
~Jennifer Aniston
"I had a lot of trouble in school and was put into remedial classes. I thought that I was stupid"
~Professor Elizabeth Blackburn. Nobel Prize in Medicine
"I feel like my whole life I’ve been insecure about looking not smart"
~Barbara Corcoran Successful Entrepreneur and Shark Tank Star
“I assumed I was dumb.”
~Debbie Macomber New York Times #1 Bestseller
Instead of realizing they have a specific learning disability, which is not at all related to intelligence, they assumed they were lacking in intelligence. And in this situation, many would initiate an all-out effort to hide their supposed lack of intelligence. Using every bit of their charm and social skills to divert attention away from the problem. I've personally seen this in action many times and admittedly fallen for it just as many.
While children of either gender often try to hide the problem, girls often being generally more socially skilled are more capable of doing so. And in so doing letting the problem fester and cause deeper scars.